Arms export control and the trilateral agreement

Door dd.

 


The absence of a common and harmonised arms export control in the European Union is an issue complicating Member State (MS) exports of military equipment already for a long time. Major combat systems can only be exported when all member MS originating equipment allow the OEM to do so. Sometimes also transport across another MS is also complicated by export limitations of that particular MS.

A Eurodefense working group (EWG35) researched this issue in the spring of 2024. Their report contains the following conclusions and recommendations and was endorsed by the Eurodefense Presidents Council on 22 May 2024:

1. Solid control of arms export is a major government responsibility of our respective Member States, but, if cleared, strong coordinated political support as well is desirable in a very competitive environment.

2. To achieve a critical mass for our defence industries, arms exports to third countries are of critical importance, just as the progressive establishment of a Common Security and Defence Policy within the EU, the European aspiration to strategic autonomy and the development of cooperative programs.

3. Full support of the principles of the current Trilateral Agreement (between France, Germany and Spain), its geographical extension and its ability to serve as a common reference for the programs co-funded by the EU instruments and for the updating of the Common Position. Conversely to not recourse to the Trilateral Agreement as the legal framework or as the proper pattern would trigger the creation of a different EU reference which would de facto fragilize the Trilateral Agreement.

4. Eurodefense calls upon all MS to adopt the trilateral agreement, first signed as French-German declaration on 22 January 2023. In a later stage Spain joined this agreement as well and currently the UK, the Netherlands and Italy are in the process of joining. When adopted by all MS, this would put an end to long standing contoversies in European arms exports control. 

Download the full report here


Populaire posts van deze blog

Recommendations for a Stronger European Defence

Door dd.
Afbeelding
Download PDF     An ambitious new European Commissioner for Defence In the current shifting global security dynamics and the increasing recognition of the need for a cohesive defence strategy, we as Eurodefense have taken a proactive stance in advocating for enhanced European defence cooperation. Since the inception of our federation in 1992, we continuously have emphasized the importance of a united approach to defence across Europe. This article intends to be a recommendation to the new European Commission, where Mr. Andrius Kubilius is the designated Commissioner for Defence. According to his Mission letter [1] as issued by Mrs. Von der Leyen, he will draft a white paper on Defence within 100 days after his appointment. The recommendations  in this article   by Eurodefense Netherlands for the European Defence Union , the Rapid Deployment Capacity , the European Defence industry  are based on several policy proposals of the Eurodefense network over the ...
Meer lezen

Clustering the EDTIB

Door dd.
Afbeelding
The reform of juste-retour, compensation and industrial participation 29 May 2024 The Ukraine War has seriously added relevance to questions about effective ways to reshape the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB). This is especially true in the EU where the traditional focus on national industry through economic offset and industrial participation has led to scattered development and costly production lines. Current policies of European Member States require compensation or industrial participation for the Defence industry when purchasing capabilities abroad. These are beneficial for the national industry of the Member States in the short and medium term, but complex and a cost driver for industry. In the long term this is not the best economic way forward for the European Union as a whole. National security is still used as main reason for these policies, but interdependence in the EU has risen to a level that strategic autonomy of a single Member State is impo...
Meer lezen

A Strategic Compass: what’s next?

Door dd.
Afbeelding
Eurodefense Position Paper  A Strategic Compass: what’s next?  Introduction  This draft working document of Eurodefense Working Group 27B has been completed before and during the war in Ukraine. The recommendations in this working document are based on the draft EU-Strategic Compass (05-01-2022, working document of EEAS) and have only gained more urgency and relevance because of this war.  • Lessons learned in the aftermath of the Afghanistan’s collapse and the war in Ukraine clearly demonstrate that the moment to create a European Union Defense Organisation (EUDO) within the framework of the EU is now! It is now mandatory to define the mutual and binding defense clause of the TEU (art.42-7) especially for the protection of non-NATO members in the EU such as Austria, Cyprus, Finland, Ireland, Malta and Sweden.  • It reminds us that large scale conventional conflicts and military violence are a continuous and actual threat to the EU and t...
Meer lezen